<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Reasons I am looking forward to the Skyfall film</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sinistredestre.wordpress.com/2012/10/26/reasons-i-am-looking-forward-to-the-skyfall-film/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sinistredestre.wordpress.com/2012/10/26/reasons-i-am-looking-forward-to-the-skyfall-film/</link>
	<description>Reflections on matters philosophical as well as cultural, also expect a strong focus on Immanuel Kant</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 May 2013 12:21:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: chrisbateman</title>
		<link>http://sinistredestre.wordpress.com/2012/10/26/reasons-i-am-looking-forward-to-the-skyfall-film/#comment-3839</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chrisbateman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2012 09:24:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sinistredestre.wordpress.com/?p=2289#comment-3839</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m looking forward to Skyfall, and have indeed been quite a loyal Bond fan in terms of cinema attendance. Ideologically, I am opposed to both the Bond franchise&#039;s portrayal of women, it&#039;s extremely positivistic techno-phillic ideology, and also its rampant Consequentialist ethics. I could not be more removed from all three of these stances! But I see in Bond films a reflection of masculine desires on all three of these points, and I learn a lot from what others accept as reasonable.

Not such a big fan of the rebooted franchise; enjoyed Casino Royale, but Quantum of Solace bored me and I felt the story concept was as weak as some in the Roger Moore era. However, the Bond movies have never been consistent, so I am optimistic for a rollicking good ride with Skyfall, when I eventually get the time to watch!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m looking forward to Skyfall, and have indeed been quite a loyal Bond fan in terms of cinema attendance. Ideologically, I am opposed to both the Bond franchise&#8217;s portrayal of women, it&#8217;s extremely positivistic techno-phillic ideology, and also its rampant Consequentialist ethics. I could not be more removed from all three of these stances! But I see in Bond films a reflection of masculine desires on all three of these points, and I learn a lot from what others accept as reasonable.</p>
<p>Not such a big fan of the rebooted franchise; enjoyed Casino Royale, but Quantum of Solace bored me and I felt the story concept was as weak as some in the Roger Moore era. However, the Bond movies have never been consistent, so I am optimistic for a rollicking good ride with Skyfall, when I eventually get the time to watch!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
